The other two awardees

had access to basic data analysis

The other two awardees

had access to basic data analysis support, in the form of organizational staff members who had experience conducting limited data analysis (e.g. descriptive statistics) but not extensive data analysis (e.g. regression analysis), which may have strengthened the manuscripts. CDC and ICF addressed this by providing the technical assistance support of a biostatistician who completed the analysis for the awardee without access to a statistician or software and provided ongoing guidance to the other two awardees with some capacity. All of the participants recommended the provision of on-going and comprehensive data analysis support when replicating these workshops. Another limitation

Gemcitabine cell line was that the tribal awardees lacked access to scientific databases and subscriptions to scientific journals to conduct literature searches required to write the introduction and discussion sections Y-27632 of their manuscripts. This challenge was addressed by having the project coordinator (and a co-author of this paper) conduct extensive literature reviews for each of the awardees. While this was helpful, the tribal participants reported that it was still difficult for them to fully articulate the contribution of their work within the context of the literature at a level required for a scientific manuscript. They reported that more extensive training and direct access to journals would help to build the capacity of tribal health practitioners to publish their work. Indeed, many countries are now requiring that university researchers funded through governmental entities target open-access journals. In the US groups like the Community Campus Partnerships for Health at the University of Washington and other community-based participatory research groups are calling upon researchers to make their work available through open-access websites. Such efforts are critically important in addressing all access issues. Lastly, despite support of these efforts from

administrative leadership at all of the participating organizations, few of the participants had time allocated outside of the workshops to work on the manuscripts during the course of regular business hours. The partners made tremendous progress on the development of their manuscripts during the trainings, however carving out time to complete the manuscripts proved to be an ongoing challenge. Thus, delivering the trainings in weeklong intensive workshops, though time intensive and expensive, may be the best way for tribal and community participants to get the time they need to create publishable manuscripts. Despite these challenges, the tribal participant expertise in intervention science, particularly in the areas of cultural adaptation and implementation, proved to be a tremendous asset to this participatory manuscript development process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>