Adjusted ORs for each exposure of interest were calculated with c

Adjusted ORs for each exposure of interest were calculated with conditional logistic regression adjusting for all exposures in addition to age, PPI use, and previous

gastrointestinal procedures. As calendar year, sex, and primary care practice were precisely PF-02341066 purchase matched on in the controls, it was not necessary to include them in the model. Comorbidity was added last, and its association with bleeding tested using a likelihood ratio test. The variance inflation factor (a measure of the increase in model variance due to correlation between variables) was calculated for each exposure of interest to assess the effect of correlation between variables. All exposures with a variance inflation factor >5 were excluded from the final conditional logistic regression model.18 The final model was then stratified into cases with a recording of peptic ulcer and those without. Sequential (or extra) population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated for each exposure, using the prevalence among the cases and the respective coefficients from the conditional logistic regression model.19 Sequential PAFs differ from the standard

adjusted PAFs that are usually presented. They are calculated CX5461 by estimating the additional proportion of cases attributable to each exposure, after removing the proportion of cases already attributed to the combined effect of all other exposures in the Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase model. The final model was then stratified into cases with a recording of peptic ulcer and those without. All analysis was performed using Stata software, version 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Previous studies of risk factor medications, such as NSAIDs,20 have been conducted in study populations that excluded patients with known risk factors for GIB.

To allow comparisons with these, we re-estimated the crude ORs for each of the risk factor medications after excluding any cases and their controls with nonmedication bleed risk factors. To assess the effect of the choice of the exposure exclusion time window before the bleed event on the effect of NSAIDs, we also re-estimated a model that included NSAID use up to 30 days before the index date. Two additional sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of potential under-reporting. First the analysis was restricted to those older than 65 years old and who were eligible for free prescriptions, to assess the effect of potential under-reporting of nonprescribed NSAID use. Secondly, multiple imputation was used to re-estimate the association with comorbidity by imputing missing values for alcohol and smoking status. Alcohol and smoking were categorised as binary exposures of excess alcohol or current smoking to fit the logistic regression imputation model.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>