For applications with a moderate number of variables, resampling-based techniques have been developed for diagnosing and improving multivariable regression models. Deriving models for high-dimensional molecular data has led to the need for adapting these techniques to settings where the number of variables is much larger than the number of observations. Three studies with a time-to-event outcome, of which one has high-dimensional data, are used to illustrate several techniques.
Investigations at the covariate level and at the predictor level are seen to provide considerable insight into model stability Captisol nmr and performance. While some areas are indicated where resampling techniques for model building still need further refinement,
our case studies illustrate that these techniques can already be recommended for wider use.”
“Study Design: Retrospective review of consecutive case series.\n\nObjective: To assess the safety and efficacy of the microendoscopic approach for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.\n\nSummary of Background Data: The standard surgical approach for the treatment of recurrent disc herniation uses an open technique with a wide exposure. Many would consider a minimally invasive approach such as microendoscopic discectomy (MED) to be contraindicated in the setting of recurrent disc herniation.\n\nMethods: Sixteen consecutive patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation who PF-02341066 supplier failed conservative management underwent MED. Before surgery and at follow-up, patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36, and assessment of leg pain using the Visual Analog Scale. Outcome was also assessed using modified McNab criteria.\n\nResults: No case required conversion to an open procedure. Mean operative time was 108 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 32 mL. The only surgical complications were 2 durotomies that were treated with dural sealant without sequelae. Mean hospital BIIB057 price stay was 23 hours, and mean follow-up was 14.7 months. Approximately 80% of patients had good or excellent outcomes based
on modified McNab criteria. The remaining 3 patients had fair outcomes, and no patient had a poor outcome. All standardized measures improved significantly, including mean Visual Analog Scale for leg pain (8.2 to 2.2, P < 0.001), mean Oswestry Disability Index (59.3 to 26.7, P < 0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary score (28.3 to 42.4, P < 0.001), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary score (38.2 to 48.3, P < 0.001). As of last follow-up no patient has showed recurrence of herniation or evidence of delayed instability.\n\nConclusions: MED is a safe and effective surgical approach for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Standardized measures of outcome show that MED for recurrent herniation produces improvement in pain, disability, and functional health that is at least comparable with outcomes reported for conventional open microdiscectomy.