Furthermore, once management realizes that the ratio is 100:1 or even greater, then it is too late for reducing the ratio through thinnings. On the other hand, if thinning regimes are forecast by a simulator that consistently over-predicts height:diameter ratios, then management will be cautious regarding projections, only to find that the stands have remained in the zone of stability, which allows for future thinnings to maintain stand stability. Height:diameter ratios of individual trees predicted by the four growth simulators never Bortezomib molecular weight exceeded the maximum observed values in Arnoldstein, but they did exceed the observed maximum values in Litschau. We therefore compared the maximum values found in Litschau to

maximum values observed by the Austrian National Forest Inventory. Note that we used only trees that were actually measured for height from the Austrian National Forest Inventory for this comparison. Predicted values did not exceed the values of the National Forest Inventory selleck compound for any dbh class. We conclude that predictions for individual trees remain in a likely data range for very dense stands. Our investigations showed that the simulated values are sometimes higher than the reference equations of Stampfer (1995). However, the values simulated are not unreasonably high. The entire curves are

within the range of the open-grown tree values in the original dataset used by Stampfer (1995) and Lässig (1991). From our results

for open-grown trees, there seems to RG7420 cell line be an illogical curve form for the growth models, except for Moses, on some sites. Height:diameter ratios first increase and peak and only monotonically decrease after some time ( Fig. 6). The curve form does not correspond to the monotonically decreasing height:diameter ratios found in open-grown tree studies ( Thren, 1986, Lässig, 1991, Stampfer, 1995 and Hasenauer, 1997). A similar pattern was observed on permanent research plots for both dominant and mean trees planted at low densities ( Busse and Weissker, 1931 and Neumann, 1997), whereas monotonically decreasing patterns were found for young stands with high initial densities ( Busse and Weissker, 1931). Similarly, for our simulations we found that the curve form was sensitive to starting values. If starting height:diameter ratios were high, then the ratios monotonically decreased over time; if the starting values were low, then there was a peak. The incorrect patterns predicted for open-grown trees might therefore be an artefact, because growth models were fitted from stand data. We compared the simulated open-grown tree dimensions of the four forest growth models to values reported in the literature. There were few comparable studies, because most studies on open-grown trees do not include stand age (Stampfer, 1995 and Hasenauer, 1997) or values are available only for young trees (<30 years) (Hartig, 1868, Kramer et al.