However, low N (or low BIS) may still be related to impulsivity, but then under other conditions than focused on in the present study, i.e., conflicted circumstances. In conclusion, researchers studying reward sensitivity should be aware of possible confounding effects of subsystems underpinning trait avoidance, and perhaps fear related avoidance in particular. “
“Appearance cues and brief displays of behavior (so called “thin slices”) are a sufficient source of information for forming quite accurate impressions of other people. To a certain degree, measures of such first impressions predict job performances, financial performances of companies, leadership effectiveness and a stranger’s personality

(Ambady et al., 2000, Borkenau et al., 2004, Harms et al., 2012, Hecht and

LaFrance, 1995, Kenny et al., 1992, Olivola et al., 2014, Rule and Ambady, TSA HDAC purchase 2008 and Wong et al., 2011). Consequently, people seem to verbally and nonverbally communicate their abilities and personality to their social environment while their social environment, in turn, uses this information to create an impression (Ambady et al., 2000). Given such evidence it is not surprising that appearance and other nonverbal cues also play a role in the domain of politics. For instance, politicians or leaders that show facial micro-expressions of facial affect or a heightened overall nonverbal expressiveness influence the emotional state of their audience as well as the impressions this audience forms of their leaders (Cherulnik et al., 2001 and Stewart Ibrutinib mw et al., 2009). Moreover, people readily attribute trustworthiness, competence, dominance, and other personality traits to facial photographs of political candidates and some of these ratings

are reliable predictors of actual and hypothetical voting decisions (Little et al., 2012, Olivola and Todorov, 2010, Oosterhof and Todorov, 2008 and Poutvaara et al., 2009). In the current study we extended the research on first impressions of second politicians. We explored whether people’s ratings of socially relevant traits can be predictors of the behavioral responses a politician might receive from the plenary in the parliament. Our focus was on dynamic cues such as gestures and body motion because people appear to be able to read affective states from motion or to attribute different personalities to different motion cues (Clarke et al., 2005, Hugill et al., 2011, Pollick et al., 2001 and Thoresen et al., 2012). For this reason we translated short video clips of politicians into stick figure animations in order to create abstract representations of the speakers’ body movements that diminish the influence of confounding variables such as appearance cues and the speakers’ gender (see also Koppensteiner & Grammer, 2011). These animations were then rated on dominance, competence, trustworthiness and the Big Five personality dimensions.