The following section will examine what considerations in each of these three categories of input – governance, management, and development – are likely to contribute to beneficial MPA outcomes. First, it needs to be acknowledged that the success of both conservation and development are influenced by the local and macro social, economic, and ecological contexts within which the MPA operates. Context is an important determinant of the nature and extent of the outcomes and the success of protected areas throughout the world. No MPA

can be disassociated from either the local social, cultural, economic, political, and environmental context or macro level contextual factors, such as history, politics, policies, macro-economics, environmental shocks, climate change, demographic shifts, and Epacadostat purchase technology. These contextual factors, which need to be incorporated into MPA design and management, can be differentiated from inputs EPZ5676 in that they may be difficult or even impossible to predict, control, or change. This is particularly true for macro level factors, such as climate change [103]. Though contextual factors

at the macro level are less controllable, local level factors can be incorporated directly into development, management, and governance approaches and inputs [10] and [104]. Micro-level contextual factors that can influence outcomes include assets (i.e., natural, social, financial, physical, political, and human capital), underlying norms and values, pre-existing social and political structures, cultural practices, ecosystem health and PRKACG population dynamics, resources utilized, and fishing methods or harvesting practices. The underlying assets in a community might be a particularly important focus for designing MPA-related development interventions as assets form the basis of livelihood options and adaptability, the choice of livelihoods, cultural norms, strength of institutions, levels of compliance,

and choices of gear/use of destructive gear [91] and [105]. The localized biology and ecology of an area will also influence the level of fisheries or tourism benefits that are achievable from MPA creation [106]. For example, MPAs that are more isolated tend to produce significantly greater biomass and species benefits [9]. Though a more extensive discussion of the role of context in determining outcomes is beyond the scope of the current paper, the importance of considering context in the design of governance, management, and development inputs for MPAs cannot be overstated. Otherwise, there is a “risk of misfit” to the context resulting in ineffectual or even counter productive actions [107]. MPAs may not be suitable management interventions in all contexts [106] and [108].