The FTDC criteria reached a sensitivity of 93% for

possible and 80% for probable bvFTD. Early-onset cases displayed significantly more disinhibition, loss of empathy and compulsive behavior with respect to late-onset bvFTD leading to a slightly higher sensitivity of the diagnostic criteria (97% vs 91%). There were no differences in the diagnostic performance between tau-positive and tau-negative cases. In subjects clinically diagnosed as LY2157299 nmr bvFTD, a “possible bvFTD” diagnosis reached a positive predictive value for FTLD pathology of 90%, irrespective of underlying proteinopathy. False-positive clinical diagnoses were mainly Alzheimer’s disease. These cases were significantly older, had less family history of dementia and had a predominantly apathetic clinical picture. The revised bvFTD criteria present good sensitivity and positive predictive value in both early

and late-onset cases and regardless of the underlying FTLD pathology. “
“Probably all neuropathologists know this dilemma: on the one hand, they have extremely precious archival material in their possession, which has Vismodegib nmr been collected over many years from many different laboratories. Typically, this material is extremely well characterized, and often, it contains especially significant tissue specimens from unique cases. On the other hand, they face severe scepticism when they plan to use this archival material for large-scale gene expression studies by microarray analysis, since previous handling in the absence of RNA protection, prolonged storage at room temperature, and fixation with formaldehyde may dramatically reduce the amount of retrievable RNA. Fortunately, this dilemma can be solved. We give here examples from Glutamate dehydrogenase our own, multiple sclerosis-centered laboratory and explain why archival tissue might be more authentic for the disease process and might yield more information about the molecular and cellular substrates driving CNS inflammation in MS patients than more recently acquired tissues. “
“Granular cell tumor (GCT) of the spine is uncommon, with intradural extramedullary location being exceptionally rare. The non-specific

clinical presentation and variable histologic patterns can make recognition of this tumor challenging. Two previous reports of GCT of the spine were reviewed (Medline 1960–2009) and analyzed with respect to this case report. The patients included two women and one man (mean age, 28.7 years). Patients presented with 3 to 4 months of lower back pain and/or lower extremity radiculopathy. The lesions appeared radiographically to be intradural and extramedullary or intramedullary. The tumors were found at T10 or L1-L2 space. Radiographically, all tumors enhanced homogenously on T1 post-gadolinium imaging with a mean tumor size of approximately 1.6 cm. Histologically, the tumors were composed of large, polygonal granular cells.