They are often violated in published work, however, so apparently they are not perceived as obvious. The essential point is that an experiment should be capable of supplying the information that the experimenter is seeking to extract. The necessary design, therefore, must depend on the context in which the experiment is being used. If the aim is to obtain kinetic parameters to be used for elucidating an enzyme mechanism, the conditions need to be varied in ranges in which the results

vary with the parameter of interest. If the aim is to understand the physiological role of an enzyme it needs to be studied in conditions that do not depart more than necessary from physiological conditions. All this is simply common sense, but it is useful to consider it in a little Caspase inhibitor clinical trial more detail. This is a point that arises when there are two or more independent variables—two different substrate concentrations, for example, or a substrate and an click here inhibitor concentration. Put in words it is indeed obvious: if two variables are not independent then they are not independent! However, in practice it may not be obvious without an understanding of what independence means. This is easy to define for a linear regression model: it is sufficient to require that two independent variables x1x1 and x2x2 must not satisfy any linear equation

x2=a+bx1x2=a+bx1, where a and b are any constants. It is also easy to illustrate the consequences of violating this requirement in a linear regression. Virtually none of the Branched chain aminotransferase equations considered in enzyme kinetics lead to linear models if properly analysed, 1 but in practice it is not difficult to ensure that the independent variables are indeed independent even in a non-linear regression: in essence, it means that knowledge of the values of one independent variable must not allow the values

of another to be calculated. In the simplest case, concentrations must not be varied in constant ratio, or with a constant sum. This does not of course exclude the possibility that one may want to remove the independence between two or more variables. For example, the method of Yagi and Ozawa (1960) for analysing multiple inhibition involves using linear combinations of the concentrations of two or more inhibitors, and that proposed much more recently by Cortés et al. (2001) for assessing whether two competing substrates bind at the same site involves linear combinations of the two substrate concentrations. In these sorts of experiments one is deliberately suppressing differences between the effects of the two variables in order to shine more light on some effect of the two together, and as long as this is understood there is no objection to the use of linear combinations of concentrations.