This difference was statistically significant, being €201 (95% CI 15 to 426) less expensive per player in the experimental ABT-199 mouse group. Direct healthcare costs were not significantly different between the Modulators groups, at €44 (95% CI −17 to 111) lower in the experimental group. The indirect non-healthcare costs per player were significantly lower in the experimental
group, with a mean difference of €172 (95% CI 28 to 352). The mean overall costs per injured player were €256 (SD 555) in the experimental group and €606 (SD 1944) in the control group (Table 6, for individual patient data see Table 4 on the eAddenda). This difference was statistically significant, being €350 (95% CI 51 to 733) less expensive per injured player in the experimental group. Direct healthcare costs per injured player did not differ significantly between the groups, at €76 (95% CI −18 to 285) lower in the experimental group. The indirect non-healthcare costs per injured player were significantly lower in the experimental group, with a mean difference of €288 (95% CI 49 to 589). After bootstrapping, there was a significant AZD0530 in vitro difference in mean costs of €201 (95% CI 15 to 426) per player and a mean non-significant difference of 3.5 injuries per group (95% CI −40.3 to 46.8)
in favour of the experimental group. From a cost perspective, the experimental intervention was considered dominant compared to the regular warmup. The cost-effectiveness plane with all incremental costeffectiveness ratios (5000 samples) is presented in Figure 3. The bootstrap analyses showed that the intervention program is cost-saving and more effective in 55% of the bootstrap replicates (SE quadrant) and cost-saving and less effective in 43% (SW quadrant). After imputation of the mean costs per injury for the missing injury data, the cost difference of €272 (95% CI 94 to 502) per player in favour of the experimental group
was statistically significant. This further supports the dominance of the intervention program over the regular warm-up. In this sensitivity analysis, the intervention program is cost-saving and more Mephenoxalone effective in 55% of the bootstrap replicates (SE quadrant) and cost-saving and less effective in 45% (SW quadrant). This study showed that the injury prevention program The11 (without fair play advice) reduced the costs associated with soccer injuries among Dutch adult male amateur soccer players, although it failed to reduce the number of injuries in this group significantly ( van Beijsterveldt et al 2012). The intervention led to a significant reduction in mean overall costs, by €201 per player and €349 per injured player, compared to the control group.