Isolated liver cells were cultured with 10(-3) M of cholesterol,

Isolated liver cells were cultured with 10(-3) M of cholesterol, and with 10(-3) M of cholesterol and addition of 10(-6), 10(-8), or 10(-10) M of DEX. After 24, 48, and 72 h, the cell proliferation, bile salt concentration,and profile were examined. The proliferative activity of control hepatocytes

ranged between 0.841 +/-0.05 and 0.937 +/-0.007. In opposite to 10(-8) M DEX, the addition of 10(-6) and 10(-10) M of DEX resulted in a decrease in proliferative activity of cells after 48 h of incubation (0.519+/-0.12 and 0.533+/-0.13, respectively). The presence of DEX resulted in elevation of bile salt level in samples obtained after 72 h (3.97+/-1.2 mu M/L; 3.42+/-2.0 mu M/L, and 3.52+/-0.3 mu M/L in the presence of 10(-6) M, 10(-8) M, and 10(-10) M of DEX, respectively). Proliferative response of rat hepatocytes to DEX depended on dose and incubation PCI-32765 cell line time. DEX in the highest concentration intensified the bile salts synthesis much earlier than under other experimental conditions. Among the analysed bile salts, cholic and deoxycholic acids predominated. They were conjugated mostly with 432 taurine and to a lesser extent with glicine.”
“The effects of disturbances on coral reef fishes have been

extensively documented but most studies have LY3039478 nmr relied on opportunistic sampling following single events. Few studies have the spatial and temporal extent to directly compare the effects of multiple disturbances over a large geographic scale. Here, benthic communities and butterflyfishes on 47 reefs of the Great Barrier Reef were surveyed annually to examine their responses to physical disturbances (cyclones and storms) and/or biological disturbances (bleaching, outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish and white syndrome disease). The effects on benthic and butterflyfish communities varied among reefs depending on the structure and geographical setting of each community, on

the size and type of disturbance, and on the disturbance history of that reef. There was considerable variability in the response of butterflyfishes to different disturbances: physical disturbances (occurring with or without biological disturbances) produced substantial declines in abundance, whilst biological disturbances occurring on their own did not. Butterflyfishes with the narrowest eFT-508 concentration feeding preferences, such as obligate corallivores, were always the species most affected. The response of generalist feeders varied with the extent of damage. Wholesale changes to the butterflyfish community were only recorded where structural complexity of reefs was drastically reduced. The observed effects of disturbances on butterflyfishes coupled with predictions of increased frequency and intensity of disturbances sound a dire warning for the future of butterflyfish communities in particular and reef fish communities in general.

Comments are closed.