Other clinical studies have shown that in elderly volunteers the immunogenicity of intradermal-TIV 15 μg is comparable with that of an intramuscular subunit vaccine adjuvanted with MF59 [24]. Data from clinical trials indicate that intradermal delivery of influenza vaccines results in significantly enhanced immune responses compared with the conventional intramuscular vaccination route [25] and [26]. This superiority

is consistent with the idea of a large number of dendritic cells present in the skin, which act as potent antigen-presenting cells important in immune surveillance, http://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-98059.html resulting in a strong humoral and cellular immune responses [27] and [28]. Our comparison of two groups that had both received the seasonal influenza vaccine overcame confounding by indication. We derived an accurate indicator of chronic illness based

on dispensed cardiovascular and respiratory medication during 2011, assuming prescription composition and duration as a proxy for chronic comorbidity [29]. We were able to find Selleck BMS-754807 a positive laboratory result for influenza virus in over 97% of all hospitalizations, 93% were confirmed by PCR, suggesting a high specificity of the case definition in our study. Most of our study cases (241 out of 260; 93%) were ascertained through active surveillance; therefore, the variability in the quality of CMBD registers, or the likelihood of specimen sampling variability for laboratory confirmation of influenza virus across hospitals should these not have significantly affected our results. However, a potential limitation of our study is that, although the same study protocol was used to detect influenza-like illness

(ILI) admissions within 7 days of symptom onset across hospitals, ILI hospital admission criteria may vary among hospitals. This could result in a differential sensitivity to detect the actual number of influenza-related hospitalizations across study hospitals. Under this scenario, it is possible that bias was introduced by the fact that only one type of vaccine was distributed for the catchment area of each hospital, because the probability of cases going undetected could be associated with vaccine type. However, sensitivity analysis excluding the hospital showing higher admission rates for influenza-related hospitalizations did not vary the conclusions of this study. Our data suggest that intradermal-TIV vaccination performed using a microinjection system provides higher protection against influenza-related hospitalization in elderly adults compared with the virosomal-TIV, intramuscularly delivered influenza vaccine in 2011–2012, a season where A(H3N2) dominated [30].