To identify regions of the brain that are LY2157299 price associated with anticipated guilt as predicted by our model, we examined trials during the return phase in which participants matched expectations by returning the amount of money that they believed their partner expected (n = 207), as compared to trials in which they returned less than they believed their partner expected (n = 183). This allowed us to identify neural systems associated
with guilt aversion and also to see systems involved in maximizing financial payoffs. For this analysis, we excluded trials by modeling them as covariates of no interest where (1) the partner sent $0, and thus there was no decision for the participant to make (n = 33), (2) the participant returned more than their second order belief (n = 66), and (3) the participants either did not indicate their belief or the amount they wanted to return (n = 20). This model thus included the following 30 regressors: (1) Face phase We compared trials in which the participant matched their expectations to trials in which they returned less than their expectations (+0.99 −0.33 −0.33 −0.33 for regressors 5–8). The results of this analysis can be seen in Figure 4 and Table S2. An additional question of interest is whether the activations
found above change parametrically as this website a function of deviation from matching expectations. To address this, we tested a parametric contrast in which we compared trials in which participants matched expectations to a linear deviation in 10% increments Winsorized at 30%. Responses greater than or equal to 30% were grouped together, as these were relatively
rare and this procedure ensured that the number of cases were balanced across regressors. This contrast specifically compared matching expectations to returning 10% less, 20% less, and 30+% less (+6 −1 −2 −3 Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease for regressors 5–8) using the model from Analysis 1 . To address the hypothesis that regions associated with guilt aversion should become more active as a function of guilt sensitivity, we extracted the average third-level parameter estimates from each of the regions of interest and examined their relationship with our measure of counterfactual guilt. We extracted the average values in the clusters located in the right and left DLPFC, insula, SMA, MOFC, and DMPFC by restricting to voxels that were located both in these clusters and in the respective anatomical masks taken from the Harvard-Oxford probabilistic atlas. Because of the small size of the nucleus accumbens, all voxels located in a bilateral anatomical mask were used regardless of statistical significance. We used the individual slopes (BLUPs) from the random effects component of the counterfactual guilt analysis as our metric of guilt sensitivity.