J Bacteriol 2009, 191:5793–5801 PubMedCrossRef 41 Esteve-Núñez A

J Bacteriol 2009, 191:5793–5801.PubMedCrossRef 41. Esteve-Núñez A, Núñez C, Lovley DR: Preferential reduction of FeIII over fumarate by Geobacter sulfurreducens. J Bacteriol 2004, 186:2897–2899.PubMedCrossRef 42. Esteve-Núñez A, Rothermich M, Sharma M, Lovley D: Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens under nutrient-limiting conditions in continuous culture. Environ Microbiol 2005, 7:641–648.PubMedCrossRef 43. Cardenas E, Wu WM, Leigh Combretastatin A4 price MB, Carley J, Carroll S, Gentry T, Luo J, Watson D, Gu B, Ginder-Vogel M, Kitanidis PK, Jardine PM, Zhou J, Criddle CS, Marsh TL, Tiedje JM: Microbial communities in contaminated sediments, associated with bioremediation of uranium to submicromolar levels. Appl

Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:3718–3729.PubMedCrossRef 44. Wilkins MJ, Verberkmoes NC, Williams KH, Callister SJ, Mouser PJ, Elifantz H, N’guessan AL, Thomas BC, Nicora CD, Shah MB, Abraham P, Lipton MS, Lovley DR, Hettich RL, Long PE, Banfield JF: Proteogenomic monitoring of Geobacter physiology during

stimulated uranium bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:6591–6599.PubMedCrossRef 45. Howarth RW: A rapid and precise method for determining sulfate in seawater, estuarine waters, and sediment pore waters. Limnol Oceanogr 1978, 23:1066–1069.CrossRef 46. Desvaux M, Guedon E, Petitdemange H: Carbon flux distribution and kinetics of cellulose fermentation in steady-state continuous cultures of Clostridium cellulolyticum on a chemically defined medium. J Bacteriol 2001, 183:119–30.PubMedCrossRef 47. Zaunmüller T, Kelly DJ, Glöckner Mirabegron FO, Unden G: Succinate dehydrogenase functioning Foretinib clinical trial by a reverse redox loop mechanism and fumarate reductase in sulphate-reducing bacteria. Microbiol 2006, 152:2443–53.CrossRef 48. Harris RF, Adams SS: Determination of the carbon-bound electron composition of microbial cells and metabolites by dichromate oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979, 37:237–243.PubMed 49. Postgate JR, Kent HM, Robson RL, Chesshyre JA: The genomes of Desulfovibrio gigas and D. vulgaris. J Gen Microbiol 1984, 130:1597–1601.PubMed 50. Caccavo F Jr, Lonergan DJ, Lovley DR,

Davis M, Stolz JF, McInerney MJ: Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994, 60:3752–3759.PubMed 51. Kraemer JT, Bagley DM: Supersaturation of LY2874455 supplier dissolved H 2 and CO 2 during fermentative hydrogen production with N 2 sparging. Biotechnol Lett 2006, 28:1485–1491.PubMedCrossRef 52. Brock TD, ML Brock, TL Bott, Edwards MR: Microbial life at 90°C: the Sulfur Bacteria of Boulder Spring. J Bacteriol 1971, 107:303–314.PubMed 53. Hicks RE, Amann RI, Stahl DA: Dual staining of natural bacterioplankton with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and fluorescent oligonucleotide probes targeting kingdom-level 16S rRNA sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992, 58:2158–2163.

pseudotuberculosis virulence after comparative proteomic analyses

pseudotuberculosis virulence after comparative proteomic analyses. b Proteins identified in this study by TPP/LC-MSE c Searches of similarity against publicly available protein databases using Blast-p. Strikingly, one variant protein of the C. pseudotuberculosis exoproteome, a conserved hypothetical exported protein with a cutinase domain [GenBank:ADL10384], has its coding sequence present in the genome of the C231 strain but absent from the genome of the 1002 strain (additional file 6). The genomic structure of the gene’s

surroundings is indicative of a region prone to recombination events, such as horizontal gene transfer [58]. In fact, it seems that gene gain and loss are frequent events leading to variations observed in the bacterial exoproteomes EPZ5676 manufacturer [39, 59]. Variation of the core exoproteome: differential expression analysis of the common proteins by LC-MSE In addition to identifying qualitative variations in the exoproteomes of the two C. pseudotuberculosis strains, we were also able to detect relative differences in expression of the proteins common

to the two proteomes through label-free protein quantification by the LC-MSE method. Relative protein quantification by this method can be obtained with basis on the accurate precursor ion mass and electrospray intensity data, acquired Rabusertib during the low energy scan step PIK3C2G of the alternating scan mode of MS acquisition [14]. Importantly, this quantitative attribute of the technique opens up new possibilities of utilization, Enzalutamide nmr as grows the interest on the so-called physiological proteomics [21]. Thirty-four out of 44 proteins commonly identified in the exoproteomes of the strains 1002 and C231 of C. pseudotuberculosis were considered by the PLGS quantification algorithm as having significantly variable expression (score > 250; 95% CI) (Figure 3, additional files 2 and 7). If we further filter

these results for the proteins presenting differential expression higher than 2-fold between the strains, we end up with only four proteins up-regulated in the 1002 strain and sixteen in the C231 strain (Figure 3). Figure 3 Differential expression of the proteins composing the core C. pseudotuberculosis exoproteome, evaluated by label-free relative quantification using LC-MS E . Results are shown as natural log scale of the relative quantifications (1002:C231) for each protein. Only proteins that were given a variation score higher than 250 by PLGS quantification algorithm are presented. Proteins regulated more than 2-fold in each strain are indicated. Protein identification numbers correspond to additional files 2 and 7 : Tables S1 and S4. Among the group of proteins not presenting considerable variations in expression between the two C.

A temperature

of 50°C was chosen as an optimal

A temperature

of 50°C was chosen as an optimal annealing temperature for subsequent real-time PCR studies. At this temperature the difference in fluorescence signal between beacon alone and beacon-target hybrids is large; in the absence of target any fluorescence detected is background level and the temperature is high enough to prevent less energetically favourable hybrids from forming, e.g., primer dimers or beacon-primer dimers. In the process of carrying out the melting DZNeP curve analysis for all beacons, different concentrations were tested, to find the appropriate concentration at which the fluorescence signal was neither too low nor saturated. The concentrations at which the particular beacons exhibited the desired

amount of fluorescence signal in these reactions PU-H71 were: MBIAC, 50 pmol/μl; MBinvA, 4.9 pmol/μl; MBprot6E, 4.4 pmol/μl; and MBfliC, 10 pmol/μl. Finally, these selleck inhibitor Thermal denaturation profiles illustrate the good quality of the molecular beacons and their efficiency in hybridising with the appropriate target sequence. Figure 1 Thermal denaturation profiles of the molecular beacons. Thermal denaturation profiles of the molecular beacons used in this study as established by melting curve analysis (described in Materials and Methods). The figure shows normalised fluoresence thermal transitions of molecular beacon plotted in pink circles and beacon-target complexes plotted in blue squares. Standard curves and limit of detection Standard curves were initially plotted to ensure the ability of each molecular beacon to detect its specific Salmonella target and the detection limit of the assay. The copy numbers of target standards used ranged from 101 to 106 copies per reaction. These plots represent how the amplification Etomidate of DNA progresses with each log increase of target copy number. The small standard errors calculated from multiple values of the threshold

cycle at which significant DNA amplification was observed (threshold cycle, CT) for each reaction and indicated on the graphs with horizontal lines above and below each plotted point, suggest that the PCR amplification is highly reproducible. The CT values for the target sequences depended on the initial DNA amount in each reaction as shown by the linear relationship of standard curves along a 6-log range which yields an R2 correlation value higher than 0.994 in all three cases (Fig. 2). The correlation was 0.995 with 76% efficiency for invA, 0.997 and 84% efficiency for prot6E and 0.999 and 100% efficiency for fliC. As the reactions worked well for all target standard concentrations tested, the lower limit of detection for the assay was set to be 10 copies of the required target fragment per reaction. Based on the standard curves and the limit of detection of this assay, negative results were defined as those exhibiting CT values higher than 45.

Imaging with a high energetic electron beam is actually in contra

Imaging with a high energetic electron beam is actually in contrast to light microscopy a “single shot in the dark” because it quickly destroys the sample. Imaging with visible light, on the other hand, has the great advantage of being able to register GSK461364 datasheet dynamic processes. The development of three-dimensional light microscopy with confocal microscopes and the nowadays widespread application of in vivo fluorescent proteins, such as selleck GFP, have been recognized as an important step in the development of science (see Nobel Prize for chemistry 2008 on nobelprize.​org). This enabled ways to watch processes that were previously

invisible, such as the development of nerve cells in the brain or how cancer cells spread. The recent increase in impact of (light) microscopy is also obvious by looking at the contributions in “Biophysical techniques in photosynthesis”, a book with the same scope as this special issue, edited by the late Jan Amesz

and Arnold Hoff in 1996 (Amesz and Hoff 1996). Of its 24 chapters, only one was devoted learn more to (electron) microscopy. Out of the many microscopy techniques, some traditional aspects and emerging methods relevant to photosynthesis have been selected for this part of the special issue. Four chapters are on light microscopy, two on EM, and one on scanning probe microscopy. In the first chapter, Cisek et al. start with a general introduction to light microscopy and its historical development. Emerging as well as most frequently used optical microscopy techniques are reviewed, including the above mentioned three-dimensional Fenbendazole light microscopy with confocal microscopes and the enhancement of contrast by phase contrast microscopy.

One of the emerging techniques is nonlinear microscopy. It presents numerous advantages over linear microscopy techniques including improved deep tissue imaging, optical sectioning, and imaging of live unstained samples. Nonetheless, nonlinear microscopy is in its infancy, lacking protocols, users, and applications; hence, this review focuses on the potential of nonlinear microscopy for studying photosynthetic organisms. Fluorescence techniques have a special place in photosynthesis, not in the least because fluorescence provides information about the lifetime of the excited states. Chen and Clegg give a short account of lifetime-resolved imaging, in order to acquaint readers who are not experts with the basic methods for measuring lifetime-resolved signals throughout an image. They present the early fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLI) history, instruments and experiments and discuss briefly the fundamentals of the fluorescence response that one is measuring, and introduce the basic measurement methodologies. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is a technique that visualizes the excited state kinetics of fluorescence molecules with the spatial resolution of a fluorescence microscope.

It is unevenly distributed within the pasture

and often a

It is unevenly distributed within the pasture

and often accumulates at feeding, rest and water places (König 2002; Owens et al. 2003). This results in further differentiation in sward structure and soil conditions. In the process of grazing and excretion, a decoupling of major plant nutrients takes place. Usually, more K is excreted in urine than in dung (Whitehead 2000); while GSK458 mw P is mainly excreted in dung. A certain amount of N is excreted with dung, the rest with urine (e.g. Schellberg et al. 2007). Thus, the more N cattle take up, the higher the ratio of N in urine versus N in dung (Whitehead 1995). On urine patches, legumes are especially negatively affected. White clover competes only poorly for mineral N with grasses and is more susceptible to scorch. N2 fixation can be markedly depressed in the urine patch (Ball et al. 1979;

LY411575 nmr Ledgard et al. 2001). Therefore, urine patches become grass dominated (Ledgard et al. 1982), but the degree of clover reduction and N2 fixation is dependent on the time of urine application as well as the clover content of the sward (Ball et al. 1979; Ledgard et al. 1982). Thus, Norman and Green (1958) did not find an effect of a single urine application on the botanical composition of a pasture. Dung patches may lead to an increase in the total yield of grasses around the pats (MacDiarmid and Watkin 1971; Norman and Green 1958). This effect was shown to be stronger when the excretion was combined with defoliation. Underneath the cow pat, the vegetation died (MacDiarmid JIB04 in vivo and Watkin 1971). Dung patches were found to decrease species turnover and thus have a stabilizing effect on plant composition in their direct surroundings in mountain pastures (Gillet et al. 2010). Grazing management and

diversity The development of a specific sward structure is induced by the behaviour of the grazing animal as discussed above and by agricultural management (pasture maintenance) on a background of site characteristics. Important with respect to grazing management is the grazing intensity, grazing selleck inhibitor system and the type and breed of grazing animal. The effects of grazing are further modified and partly determined by the level of nutrient input (fertilization; additional feeding), and the intensity of intermittent management like cutting or topping, rolling and harrowing, usually intended to decrease grazing effects. However, these secondary management effects will not be considered in more depth here. High grazing intensity has often been blamed for negative effects on diversity (Dumont et al. 2009; Henle et al. 2008; Plantureux et al. 2005; Vallentine 2001). With increasing intensity, animals become less selective in the choice of their diet in order to obtain sufficient intake (Dumont et al. 2007). Thus, defoliation will be more homogeneous than on less intensively grazed paddocks, creating less diverse niches.

5 Adenocarcinoma 7 17 Papillary serous 6 15 Clear cell adenocarci

5 Adenocarcinoma 7 17 Papillary serous 6 15 Clear cell adenocarcinoma 2 5 Endometrioid 3 7 Mucinous adenocarcinoma 3 7 Poorly differentiated 10 24.5 Stage at diagnosis     I,II 2 5 III (A, B, C) 33 (10, 12, 11) 80 IV 6 15 N of prior chemotherapy regimens     1 3 7 2 12 29 ≥3 26 64 N of prior Akt inhibitor platinum-based regimens     1 23 56 2 9 22 3 9 22 Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncoloy Group Performance Status. Efficacy A median number of 8 cycles of GEMOX were administered (range, 2 to 12). One patient refused further treatment after the 2nd chemotherapy cycle. All patients were fully evaluable for RNA Synthesis inhibitor response and toxicity. Based on ITT analysis, 2 (5%) complete responses (CR) and 13 (32%)

partial responses (PR) were observed in 41 enrolled patients, for an overall response rate of 37% (95% CI, 22.3 to-51.7%.). Stable disease was observed in 17 patients (41%). A clinical benefit (objective responses + stable disease) was documented

in 32 patients (78%) (95% CI, 65–91) (Table 2). Among patients whose disease was originally partially platinum-sensitive, response rate BIIB057 order was 50%, while in platinum-resistant or refractory patients response rate was 26%. The PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–7.8) (Figure 1), with no significant difference between initially platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients (7.0 and 6.7 months, respectively). After a median follow-up of 14.5 months (range, 2 to 30), 69.2% and 10.1% patients were alive at 1 and 2 years, respectively; the median OS for the whole cohort was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.2–20.8) (Figure 2). The median time to self-reported symptom relief, which occurred in 22 out of 27 symptomatic patients (81.5%), Adenosine was 4 weeks (range, 2–8 weeks); even if symptom improvement translated into objective response in only 8 patients, some degree of amelioration in quality of life was reported by the vast majority of symptomatic patients. Figure 1 Progression free survival (PFS). Table 2 Objective response

in 41 patients Responses No. of patients % Complete response 2 5 Partial response 13 32 Stable disease 17 41 Progressive disease 9 22 Clinical Benefit 32 78 Figure 2 Overall survival (OS). Toxicity The dose-limiting toxicity was hematological, with G4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia observed in 2 (5%) patients and 1 (2.5%) patient, respectively, requiring G-CSF administration. G1-2 thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (10%) and 6 (15%) patients, respectively; no cases of G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia were reported. Grade 3 anemia was encountered in 2 (5%) patients, whereas G1-2 anemia was commonly observed (34% and 29%, respectively). Treatment delays because of hematological or extra-hematological toxicities were needed in 4 patients (9.7%). Dose-reductions were required in 3 (7.3%) patients because of G2 neurotoxicity. No cases of G3 or more severe neurotoxicity were observed, while G1 neurotoxicity occurred in 2 patients (5%).

In this work we observed that the adherence of different T3SS mut

In this work we observed that the adherence of different T3SS mutants to host cell tissue was not altered. Studies in several pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella typhimurium[35], E. coli[36, 37] and the plant pathogen P. syringae[38] revealed that mutants unable to produce T3SS appendages become affected in their interactions with host cells. However, in the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, it has been shown that the lack of a T3SS pilus does not affect attachment to plant cells [39], and this is consistent with our observation that adherence of X. citri to the host tissue was not affected by the absence of a functional T3SS. In addition, we determined that T3SS is required for X. citri

survival on citrus leaves and that T3SS genes are expressed while bacteria reside on the plant surface. Expression of T3SS genes on the leaf surface was also detected in Xanthomonas euvesicatoria cells suggesting a role for T3SS in epiphytic survival of the bacteria [40]. CH5183284 concentration In a recent report, it was revealed that find more the survival of Pseudomonas syringae T3SS-deficient strains on leaf surfaces is reduced, supporting a role of T3SS and effector proteins in the promotion of epiphytic bacterial survival

[41]. Our results suggest that T3SS plays a role in X. citri leaf-associated survival on the leaf surface by enabling biofilm formation. The proteomic study revealed differentially expressed proteins between X. citri and the hrpB − mutant strain and GO analysis detected enrichment of up-regulated proteins in different metabolic processes and generation of energy in the hrpB − mutant. Similarly, in a previous proteomic study, these categories were also enriched with up-regulated proteins in X. citri planktonic cells compared to biofilm, suggesting a slower metabolism and reduction in aerobic respiration in the X. citri biofilm [42]. Therefore, the higher expression of proteins involved in these processes in the hrpB − mutant compared to X. citri may be caused by the lack of biofilm formation of the mutant. It is remarkable that among the differentially Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) expressed proteins between the mutant and

the wild type strain, some have been previously characterized as involved in biofilm formation in X. citri or in other pathogenic bacteria. Such is the case of DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit β [32], tryptophan synthase [43], GroEL [44, 45], FadL [32, 42, 46] and several TBDTs [42, 47]. Interestingly, high intracellular L-tryptophan concentration prevents biofilm formation and triggers degradation of mature biofilm in E. coli[43]. The proteomic assay showed that tryptophan synthase (XAC2717) was up-regulated, while the tryptophan repressor binding protein (XAC3709) was Ruxolitinib order down-regulated in hrpB − strain suggesting a link also between tryptophan metabolism and biofilm formation in X. citri. Another example is the outer membrane protein XAC0019 that displays high homology to the fatty acid transport porin FadL.

J Agric Food Chem 2005, 53:3789–3794 CrossRefPubMed 18 Odenthal

J Agric Food Chem 2005, 53:3789–3794.CrossRefPubMed 18. Odenthal M, Koenig S, Farbrother P, Drebber U, Bury Y, Dienes HP, Eichinger L: Detection of opportunistic infections by low-density microarrays: a diagnostic approach for granulomatous lymphadenitis. Diagn MLN2238 in vitro Mol Pathol 2007, 16:18–26.CrossRefPubMed 19. Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users

and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 2000, 132:365–386.PubMed 20. Farbrother P, Wagner C, Na J, Tunggal B, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y, Schleicher M, Steinert M, Eichinger L: Dictyostelium transcriptional host cell response upon infection with Legionella. Cell Microbiol 2006, 8:438–456.CrossRefPubMed 21. Petrik J: Diagnostic applications of microarrays. Transfus Med 2006, 16:233–247.CrossRefPubMed 22. Mikhailovich V, Gryadunov D, Kolchinsky A, Makarov AA, Zasedatelev

A: DNA microarrays in the clinic: infectious diseases. Bioessays 2008, 30:673–682.CrossRefPubMed 23. Sergeev N, Distler M, Vargas check details M, Chizhikov V, Herold KE, Rasooly A: Microarray analysis of Bacillus selleckchem cereus group virulence factors. Journal of microbiological methods 2006, 65:488–502.CrossRefPubMed 24. McIver CJ, Jacques CF, Chow SS, Munro SC, Scott GM, Roberts JA, Craig ME, Rawlinson WD: Development of multiplex PCRs for detection of common viral pathogens and agents of congenital infections. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:5102–5110.CrossRefPubMed 25. Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper Thiamine-diphosphate kinase RJ, Klapper PE: Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000, 13:559–570.CrossRefPubMed 26. Pemov A, Modi H, Chandler DP, Bavykin S: DNA analysis with multiplex microarray-enhanced PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:e11.CrossRefPubMed 27. Kong F, Ma L, Gilbert GL: Simultaneous detection and serotype identification of Streptococcus agalactiae using multiplex PCR and reverse line blot hybridization. J Med Microbiol 2005, 54:1133–1138.CrossRefPubMed 28. Yang IC, Shih DY, Huang TP, Huang YP, Wang JY, Pan TM: Establishment of a novel multiplex PCR assay and detection of toxigenic

strains of the species in the Bacillus cereus group. J Food Prot 2005, 68:2123–2130.PubMed 29. Zeng X, Kong F, Wang H, Darbar A, Gilbert GL: Simultaneous detection of nine antibiotic resistance-related genes in Streptococcus agalactiae using multiplex PCR and reverse line blot hybridization assay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006, 50:204–209.CrossRefPubMed 30. Shapero MH, Zhang J, Loraine A, Liu W, Di X, Liu G, Jones KW: MARA: a novel approach for highly multiplexed locus-specific SNP genotyping using high-density DNA oligonucleotide arrays. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:e181.CrossRefPubMed 31. Broude NE, Driscoll K, Cantor CR: High-level multiplex DNA amplification. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 2001, 11:327–332.CrossRefPubMed 32.

These results exhibit that the captured T cells were well bound o

These results exhibit that the captured T cells were well bound on the surface with different morphologies of filopodia or lamellipodia as shown in Figure 2a,b. Interestingly, these images indicate that the morphology (e.g., width of these surface components) BYL719 cost of the captured T

cells is highly correlated with the size of QNPA in diameter from 200 to 450 nm. To ensure the evaluation of the filopodial width in the early stage of cell adhesion, we quantified at least approximately 20 cells. As a result, the widths of filopodia protruding from T cells bound on QNPA were determined to be approximately 69.00 ± 15.10, 71.60 ± 17.1, 104.40 ± 32.50, and 212.50 ± 16.00 nm corresponding to QNPA surface diameters of approximately 100, 200, 300, and 450 nm, respectively, as shown in Figures 2 and 3a. Filopodial morphologies on STR-QNPA below approximately 300 nm in diameter present a long extended shape, but it extends to be remarkably narrow as it has to be confined by adjacent STR-QNPs with 450 nm diameter. We noticed that captured CD4 T cells on the STR-QNPA surfaces exhibited striking differences in morphology on the varied diameters, Luminespib manufacturer even under the condition of extremely early stages of adhesion and statically stable activity of T cells (approximately 20-min Selleckchem Acadesine incubation at 4°C). Furthermore, to assess the significance of our correlation results,

p values were calculated with neighboring column data. Figure 3a exhibits that the distribution of extended filopodial width of the captured CD4 T cells were observed to increase in width by increasing the diameter of QNPA from 200 to 450 nm (**** p < 0.0001, Galeterone Figure 3b,c), resulting

in a good linear response between the width of T cells and diameter of QNPA (R 2 = 0.994, n = 20). On the other hand, the filopodial width for 100-nm QNPA shows a similar trend in size to that of the 200-nm QNPA, exhibiting a statistically insignificant difference (* p = 0.0448, bottom part in Figure 3a,b). Figure 2 SEM images of captured CD4 T cells on four different sizes of QNPA substrates. (a) Top and (b) tilt views. All captured cells were highlighted in blue for easy distinction. Figure 3 Filopodial width distribution, p values, and diagram of CD4 cells bound on four QNPA substrates. (a) Filopodial width distribution of CD4 cells bound on the four different STR-functionalized QNPA substrates after only 20 min of incubation at 4°C. Selected filopodia with distribution (top part of figure) in which only approximately 80% of filopodial width taken from the results (bottom part of figure). (b) Summary of p values for filopodial width distribution of captured CD4 T cells on four different QNPA substrates. p values <0.0001 (****) are considered statistically significant. Less significant statistical difference is represented (* p = 0.0448). (c) Schematic diagram of CD4 T cell spreading mechanism just for 20 min of incubation.


PLoS check details ONE. doi:10.​1271/​journal.​pone.​0005014 PubMed Antunes A, Troyer JL, Roelke ME, Pecon-Slattery J, Packer C et al (2008) The evolutionary dynamics of the lion Panthera leo revealed by host and viral population genomics. PLoS Genet 4. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pgen.​1000251

Bauer H (2006) Synthesis of threats, distribution and status of the lion from the two lion conservation strategies. In: Second Large Carnivore Workshop. CEDC, Maroua Bauer H, Van Der Merwe S (2004) Inventory of free-ranging lions Panthera leo in Africa. Oryx 38:26–31CrossRef Bauer H, De Iongh HH, Princee FPG, Ngantou D (2003) Research needs for lion conservation in West and Central Africa. Comptes Rendus Biol 326:112–118CrossRef Bauer H, Nowell K, Packer C (2008) Panthera leo. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2011.2 ed. http://​www.​iucnredlist.​org/​apps/​redlist/​details/​15951/​0. Accessed 12 Apr 2012 Becker MS, Watson FGR, Droge E, Leigh K, Carlson RS, Carlson AA (2012). Estimating past and future male loss in three Zambian lion populations. J Wild Manag. doi:10.​1002/​jwmg.​446 Bertola L, van Hooft W, Vrieling K, Uit de Weerd D, York D, de Iongh HH (2011) Genetic diversity, evolutionary history

and implications for conservation of the lion (Panthera leo) in West and Central Africa. J Biogeogr. AP24534 in vitro doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2699,2011.​02500.​x Björklund M (2003) The risk of inbreeding due to habitat loss in the lion (Panthera leo). Conserv Genet 4:515–523CrossRef Bond WJ, van selleckchem Wilgen BW (1996) Fire and plants. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRef Cahoon DR Jr, Stocks BJ, Levine JS, Cofer WR III, O’Neill KP (1992) Seasonal distribution of African Ketotifen savanna fires. Nature 359:812–815CrossRef Chardonnet P (2002) Conservation of the African lion: contribution to a status survey. International Foundation for the Conservation of Wildlife, France Chardonnet P, Mésochina P, Bento C, Conjo D, Begg

C et al (2009) Conservation status of the lion (Panthera leo Linnaeus, 1758) in Mozambique. Maputo, Mozambique CIESIN and CIAT (2005) Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Density Grids. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. http://​sedac.​ciesin.​columbia.​edu/​gpw. Accessed 15 Feb 2011 Coe MJ, Cumming DH, Phillipson J (1976) Biomass and production of large African herbivores in relation to rainfall and primary production. Oecologia 22:341–354CrossRef Craigie ID, Baillie JEM, Balmford A, Carbone C, Collen B et al (2010) Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas. Biol Conserv 143:2221–2228CrossRef Davidson Z, Valeix M, Loveridge A, Madzikanda H, Macdonald D (2011) Socio-spatial behaviour of an African lion population following perturbation by sport hunting. Biol Conserv 144(1):114–121CrossRef East R (1984) Rainfall, soil nutrient status and biomass of large African savanna mammals.